This topic was very interesting and the most confusing for me. It seems as though the arguments actually prove the reason why Homosexual marriages should happen. Here is a list of the arguments:
Ø Children will be born out of wedlock
Ø Fractured Families: several moms and dads, 6-8 grandparents and dozens of half siblings perchild.
Ø Same Sex couples will not provide an optimum environment to raise kids
Ø Marriage is for procreation purposes
Ø School and parents will have to accept homosexuals
Let’s begin at the top and work our way down. Children are already born out of wedlock and have been since biblical times. Even if same sex couples are not allowed to wed children will still be born out of wedlock. A couple, no matter if they are heterosexual or homosexual, wanting children will find a way with or without wedding vows. It is the heterosexual couples who are more apt to have children out of wedlock. Homosexuals either have children from previous relationships or once in a committed relationship have chosen to procreate with the assistance of sperm banks, or other means. These children will be born out of wedlock should homosexual marriages not be allowed.
Fractured families because of homosexual marriages? Millions of children are already from fractured families and have mom, dad, stepmom, stepdad, ex-stepdad, ex-stepmom, step grandparents, grandparents and half siblings from all of the heterosexual relationships mom and dad have been in. The legal system has had to create family courts, child support payment centers, facilities for supervised visits, and exchange sites for children to be transferred from one parent to the other. These systems have already been created for heterosexual couples. Fractured families are occurring from homosexual relationships as well. The problem that occurs here is the fact that the child grows learning that this couple is his/her parents. When the couple separates the parent without biological ties to the child has no rights and is forced to do what the biological parent wants in order to see the child, or never see that child again. This scenario is more devastating to the child then the separation of a heterosexual couple in my opinion because the child is the one ripped from a parent’s life. If we allow Homosexual marriage then we give these children the right to always be in both parents lives.
Same sex couples well not provide the optimum environment for raising a family. We do not restrict child molesters, rapist, abusers or other criminals from getting married. How can two people loving the child(ren) not optimum. It does not matter whether the same sex couples are married or not they are going to still raise children.
Marriage is for procreation purposes. REALLY…ok so we are not allowing anyone who cannot bear children to wed? This is like saying that the only reason to get married is to have children.
School and parents will have to accept homosexuals. Schools are already dealing with bullying regarding students who are homosexual and for those who are not. Parents do not have to accept anything. It is their choice.
Who knows what I will write about tomorrow.
Ø Children will be born out of wedlock
Ø Fractured Families: several moms and dads, 6-8 grandparents and dozens of half siblings perchild.
Ø Same Sex couples will not provide an optimum environment to raise kids
Ø Marriage is for procreation purposes
Ø School and parents will have to accept homosexuals
Let’s begin at the top and work our way down. Children are already born out of wedlock and have been since biblical times. Even if same sex couples are not allowed to wed children will still be born out of wedlock. A couple, no matter if they are heterosexual or homosexual, wanting children will find a way with or without wedding vows. It is the heterosexual couples who are more apt to have children out of wedlock. Homosexuals either have children from previous relationships or once in a committed relationship have chosen to procreate with the assistance of sperm banks, or other means. These children will be born out of wedlock should homosexual marriages not be allowed.
Fractured families because of homosexual marriages? Millions of children are already from fractured families and have mom, dad, stepmom, stepdad, ex-stepdad, ex-stepmom, step grandparents, grandparents and half siblings from all of the heterosexual relationships mom and dad have been in. The legal system has had to create family courts, child support payment centers, facilities for supervised visits, and exchange sites for children to be transferred from one parent to the other. These systems have already been created for heterosexual couples. Fractured families are occurring from homosexual relationships as well. The problem that occurs here is the fact that the child grows learning that this couple is his/her parents. When the couple separates the parent without biological ties to the child has no rights and is forced to do what the biological parent wants in order to see the child, or never see that child again. This scenario is more devastating to the child then the separation of a heterosexual couple in my opinion because the child is the one ripped from a parent’s life. If we allow Homosexual marriage then we give these children the right to always be in both parents lives.
Same sex couples well not provide the optimum environment for raising a family. We do not restrict child molesters, rapist, abusers or other criminals from getting married. How can two people loving the child(ren) not optimum. It does not matter whether the same sex couples are married or not they are going to still raise children.
Marriage is for procreation purposes. REALLY…ok so we are not allowing anyone who cannot bear children to wed? This is like saying that the only reason to get married is to have children.
School and parents will have to accept homosexuals. Schools are already dealing with bullying regarding students who are homosexual and for those who are not. Parents do not have to accept anything. It is their choice.
Who knows what I will write about tomorrow.